Method
for Single-Cell ElectroporationKurt
Haas Cline Lab
Inroduction
Single-cell electroporation (SCE) is a technique we have developed to
deliver genes into individual cells within intact tissues, although
it may also be applicable to cells in disperse cultures. Targeting transcription
to individual cells is achieved by restricting both the DNA and the
electric field required for electroporation to the 0.6-1 µm tip
of a glass micropipette. This technique is relatively easy to setup
and perform, can yield high transfection rates, and requires relatively
inexpensive, common laboratory equipment. A paper of this technique
is published in the March issue of Neuron, 2001.
This technique utilizes electroporation in which a brief external
high voltage pulse induces sufficient transmembrane potential to disrupt
the electrostatic forces maintaining lipid bilayer structure, causing
the temporarily formation of small pores in the cell membrane. DNA
and other charged molecules are then electrophoretically transferred
into the cell through these pores. Following pulse termination, pores
reseal over 10s to 100s of ms.
SCE is a powerful transfection method since it readily allows the
delivery of multiple genes each carried by independent plasmids into
a single cell. In addition, SCE can be used to transfer macromolecules
besides DNA into cells, including RNA, proteins, dyes and drugs. While
charged molecules are actively electrophoresed into cells with higher
efficiency, noncharged molecules can also diffuse from the micropipette
into cells through the pores.
The equipment required for SCE is relatively inexpensive and common
to many neuroscience laboratories. SCE does not require the purchase
of more expensive commercial electroporators. If you do not have an
electrical stimulator, we are currently developing an inexpensive
device for generating the electrical stimuli needed for this technique.
Please contact Kurt Haas if you
would be interested in such a device.
The method described here has been successful for transfecting individual
cells within the Xenopus tadpole brain in vivo and the rat
hippocampal organotypic slice culture. Modifications of micropipette
shape, electrical stimulation parameters, and methods of locating
target cells may be necessary for other preparations.
Equipment
Microscope:
dissecting scope, or upright with long working distance, low power (~20X)
objective
Voltage stimulator: Grass SD9 Stimulator (Grass-Telefactor,
West Warwick, RI) **we are currently designing an inexpensive voltage
stimulator specifically for this technique. Contact Kurt
Haas for further information
Oscilloscope: optional, but aids in monitoring pulse shape and
circuit integrity and electrode resistance
Micropipette holder: must allow sliver wire to extend from back
of micropipette
Manipulator: coarse, or combined coarse and fine depending on
preparation.
Materials
DNA: purified plasmid DNA
pipette glass: glass
capillary tubing. borosilicate - standard wall with filament. outer
diameter = 1.5 mm, inside diameter = 0.86 mm. Warner Instrument Corp.
silver wire: 0.25 mm diameter, to slide into micropipette, and
to use as an external ground
leads: to connect micropipette silver wire and ground silver wire
to voltage stimulator
Methods
Micropipettes:
Glass micropipettes must be customized for each preparation. We pull glass
capillary tubing (with filament) using a P-87 Micropipette Puller. In general,
a patch-clamp type electrode may be sufficient. The tip size should be around
0.6-1 µm and have a resistance about 10 M
when filled with standard intracellular recording solution. Shank dimensions
can vary depending on the tissue used and must balance requirements for
preventing the pipette from breaking (wider shank) and reducing tissue damage
from the pipette insertion (thinner shank).
DNA solution:
Genes of interest must be placed into expression vectors containing promoters
appropriate for tissue type. We purify our plasmid DNA using Promega Wizard
Plus MidiPreps DNA purification system (Promega, Madison, WI). We dilute
purified DNA to 0.2-1 µg/µl and fill the micropipette tip with
0.6-1 µl. Efficiency of SCE was not noticeably effected by the ionic
composition of the resuspension solution (2mM CaCl2, 20-200mM NaCl, or
only dH2O) or DNA concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 5 µg/µl.
DNA solution was introduced into the micropipette using either a 1-10
µm Eppindorf Pipettor tip, or a 1 cc plastic insulin syringe that
had been melted over flame and pulled to a long fine tip.
Circuit setup:
A thin silver wire (diameter 0.25mm) is inserted into the micropipette
touching the DNA solution at the tip. The micropipette is attached to
a coarse manipulator with a pipette holder. A second silver wire is placed
in direct electrical contact with the preparation. For SCE in tadpoles,
the ground wire is placed near (approximately 1 cm) the tadpole under
a Kimwipe moistened with saline. For hippocampal cultures, the ground
wire is placed in the culture media. The position of the ground electrode
is not important as long as it is in contact via conductive solution with
the preparation.
For transfer of negatively charged DNA into cells, the silver wire in
the micropipette is connected to the negative terminal of a SD9 Grass
voltage stimulator. The ground silver wire is connected to the positive
terminal of the stimulator.
Microscope:
The tissue (here, either intact tadpole, or rat hippocampal slice culture)
is placed under a dissecting microscope or an upright Olympus BX50 microscope
equipped with a 20X long working distance objective.
Using visual guidance at low magnification, the tip of the DNA-filled
micropipette was inserted into the tissue in a region containing dense
cell bodies. It was not necessary to directly visualize the micropipette
tip or the cell being transfected. The high density of cell bodies in
our two preparations (the cell body regions of the optic tectum of the
Xenopus tadpole brain, and of the CA1 and CA3 regions of the rat hippocampal
slice) made it likely that the electrode tip would be in close contact
with a cell somata. In preparations with less dense cell bodies this blind
technique may yield low transfection efficiencies. In these cases, it
may be beneficial to monitor tip contact with cells either by direct visualization,
or by recording the electrical resistance changes at the micropipette
tip. Direct visualization may also be necessary if one requires targeting
to a specific cell.
Stimulation parameters:
We have found that a wide range of electrical stimuli between the micropipette
and the external ground can be used for transfection by SCE. We tested
square pulses generated by the Grass SD9 stimulator and pulses which were
modulated by a capacitance circuit to produce a sharp high-voltage peak
followed by an exponential decay. We also tested trains of square pulses.
Transfection of neurons in the tadpole brain was high with exponential
decay pulses with peak voltages of 20 V and t = 70 ms. Slightly higher
transfection efficiency was achieved with 0.5-1 s trains of 1 ms long
square pulses at 50 V and 200 Hz. We found that 5 repeated pulses or trains
of pulses also increased transfection efficiency. It is useful to monitor
the electrical pulse delivered to the preparation with an oscilloscope.
This can tell whether the micropipette has clogged and has to be replaced.
Clogging can often be alleviated by applying brief pulses with alternating
polarity. In general, the same micropipette can be used at many sites,
allowing rapid insertion and stimulation followed by removal and reinsertion
at another site. We find that multiple rapid stimulations effectively
compensate for occasional incorrect micropipette placements due to blind
insertion to yield adequately high transfection efficiencies.
Detecting transfected cells:
We commonly test transfection success with the Clontech (Clontech Laboratories,
Palo Alto, CA) plasmid pEGFP, which drives green fluorescent protein expression
(GFP) with a strong CMV promoter. Single cells transfected with pEGFP
expressed bright GFP within 12 h after electroporation, detectable by
epifluorescence. We recommend first testing SCE with fluorescent dextrans
(Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), which allow direct visualization, using
epifluorescence, of dextrans filling cells. Due to the relatively small
size of dextrans compared to plasmid DNA, the electrical stimuli required
for SCE of fluorescent dextrans is much less than for DNA.
Method
for Bulk Tissue Electroporation Lisa Foa,
Cline Lab
We have adapted electroporation for transfer
of macromolecules, including DNA to the tadpole brain in vivo. Electroporation
permits one to target DNA transfection to selected regions on one side of
the brain, in addition to widespread transfection demonstrated by others
in their systems. Electroporation also offers control over the number of
cells transfected (Fig. 2). The equipment and materials required for brain
electroporation are similar to SCE. We have tested a range of conditions
and parameters. Outlined below are the electroporation conditions that work
well in stage 44 - 48 tadpole brain in vivo.
Equipment
Microscope: Dissecting scope
Capacitor: Custom made
Voltage stimulator: Grass SD9 stimulator (see SCE notes above)
Oscilloscope: Optional (see SCE notes above)
Picospritzer: Picospritzer II (General Valve Corporation)
Micropipette holder: Must permit pressure injection from picospritzer
Platinum electrodes: custom made, platinum plate electrodes approx
1 x 2 mm soldered to electric leads (for wiring to stimulator and capacitor)
and mounted on a rod for use with a micromanipulator.
Micromanipulators: Two coarse X, Y, Z manipulators. One to hold
the pressure injection pipette, one to hold the platinum electrodes.
Materials
DNA: 0.2 - 2.0µg/µl purified plasmid
DNA
Pipette glass: glass capillary tubing, boroscilicate, standard
wall with filament (World Precision Instruments Inc.) Electrode tip diameter
will depend on the application.
Methods
Micropipettes:A micropipette and Picospritzer
are used to pressure inject DNA into the brain ventricle. The shape
and size of the pipette tip is not critical, but it must be sharp enough
to easily pierce the tissue, and large enough to quickly deliver the
DNA. We use the Picospritzer II to deliver 75-125nl DNA solution directly
into the tadpole brain ventricle. The same pipette is used for multiple
animals.
DNA solution:We tested a range of plasmid concentrations
(using Clontech pEGFP) and found that concentrations ranging between
0.2 - 2.0µg/µl yield comparable numbers of fluorescent cells, with similar
intensity of GFP fluorescence. DNA can be diluted in dH2O, buffered
saline, or 2mM CaCl2. The DNA solution was colored with 0.01% fast green
as a visual aid for filling the brain ventricle. For co-electroporation
of two plasmids, we mix plasmids in a ratio of 1:1. This typically gives
a co-transfection rate of 70% ±10% (determined for the simultaneous
electroporation of of pEGFP and pDsRed).
Setup:A dissecting microscope with good optics
is sufficient. The micromanipulators are placed either side of the stage.
One manipulator holds the micropipette, connected to the Picospritzer.
The other manipulator holds the platinum electrodes connected to the
capacitor and stimulator.
Procedure:The anesthetized tadpole is placed on
a moistened kimwipe on the center of the microscope stage. The micropipette
containing DNA is inserted into the ventricle of the tadpole brain,
and the DNA is pressure injected into the ventricle. For widespread
electroporation, DNA is injected to fill the entire brain ventricle.
For targeted electroporation of a specific brain region, a concentrated
bolus of DNA should be injected as close as possible to the region of
interest. The micropipette is removed, and the platinum electrodes are
immediately lowered to contact the tadpole's skin, spanning the brain
region of interest (see Fig. 2). 2-7 voltage pulses are delivered (depending
on desired level of transfection). Effervescent bubbles are produced
at the electrode tips where they contact the skin. The level of effervescence
is a good indicator of whether you have achieved electroporation vs
electrocution. There should be numerous small bubbles along the electrode
tips. If the bubbles are large and bubbling over, the voltage is too
large and the animal will die. Another visual cue is the amount of shock
the tadpole displays. The tadpole eyes usually flick in response to
the electroporation. If the whole body jolts, the voltage is too large.
After electroporation, the tadpole is quickly returned to rearing solution,
where it usually recovers within 10 minutes.
The DNA constructs can be targeted to just one side of
the brain, or if desired, the whole brain can be transfected. This is
achieved by regulating the voltage polarity. If only one side of the
brain is to be transfected, the polarity setting on the stimulator is
set so the negatively charged DNA moves towards the positive electrode.
If both sides of the brain are to be transfected, the polarity must
be switched while the voltage pulses are being delivered.
Stimulation parameters:Depending on the number
of transfection cells desired, 2 - 7 pulses of 30 - 50V with an exponential
decay of 70 ms are optimal. To transfect fewer cells, reduce the numbers
of pulses.
Detecting transfected cells:Transfected cells expressing
GFP are detected by standard fluorescence microscopy.
Trouble shooting:We occasionally see some bleeding
in the brain ventricle 24 hrs after electroporation. This usually clears
up by 48 hrs. Propidium iodide staining indicated that electroporation
does not cause an increase in cell death. For good charge conduction:
- Ensure that the specimen remains moist - The platinum electrodes must
be cleaned regularly.
Kurt Haas, Ph.D.
Brain Research Centre
University of British Columbia
2211 Westbrook Mall
Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5
(604)822-9770 kurt.haas@ubc.ca
We have designed a series of custom macros
for Object-Image that greatly facilitate its use for morphometric
analysis of three-dimensional, time-lapse data collected from
confocal or two-photon microscopes. The downloadable files below
include each of the individual macros, a single file containing
the entire set, and instructions for their use.
NOTE: These macros will run all versions of MacOS. If you use MacOS 10.2 or later, be certain that you are using the latest version of Object-Image (currently 2.11).
A
Windows version of NIH Image, called Scion
Image is also publicly available, but lacks the overlay feature
and overlay macro commands of Object-Image that are necessary
to use the macros provided here. Since April of 1999, development
of NIH Image has stopped in favor of the platform-independent
Java-based image software IMAGE/J.
However, to date no overlay feature like that offered in Object-Image
yet exists for IMAGE/J.
It is possible to run Object-Image on a Windows
or Linux machine by using Macintosh OS emulation software. For
more details, please visit theNIH
Image FAQ site.