| Research
Projects
|
| Brain Development & Plasticity |
Hollis Cline
J. Bestman, K. Bronson, K. Burgos, M. Chen, S-L. Chiu, J. Demas, R. Ewald, J. Lee-Osbourne, H. Li , J. Li, K. Van Keuren-Jensen, V. Thirumalai, E. Rial Verde, P. Sharma, M. Hiramoto, S-Y. Lee, J. Santos da Silva, W. Shen, R-Y. Tzeng |
My research is focused on understanding the mechanisms by
which experience controls the development of the brain. My lab
addresses this fundamental question by examining the development
of the visual system in albino Xenopus tadpoles and the
development of the spinal cord in Zebrafish. The visual system
of Xenopus is well known for its experience-dependent
plasticity. We have established this preparation as an excellent
experimental system in which to conduct in vivo time
lapse imaging studies of neuronal development and synaptogenesis,
combined with both gene transfer and electrophysiological studies
of visual system function. Over the past 15 years we have demonstrated
a role for afferent coactivity, postsynaptic NMDA receptor activity,
and downstream activation of calcium-dependent enzymes including
CaMKII in controlling retinotectal synaptic maturation, optic
tectal cell structural plasticity and topographic map formation
(Wu et al., 1996; Zou and Cline, 1996; Wu and Cline, 1998; Zou
and Cline, 1999; Ruthazer et al., 2003, 2006; Haas et al 2006).
More recently, we have demonstrated that visual experience has
multiple effects on visual system development. A relatively brief
period, 4 hours, of visual experience enhances the growth rate
of tectal cell dendritic arbors through a mechanism that requires
glutamatergic transmission and the RhoA GTPases (Li et al., 2000;
Li et al., 2002; Sin et al., 2002). This same brief period of
visual experience increases the excitability of tectal neurons
and their sensitivity to visual stimuli, through a mechanism that
requires intracellular polyamines, the modulation of AMPA receptor
function and compensatory changes in sodium channel activity (Aizenman
et al., 2002, 2003).
The finding that we can use visual stimulation to modify the
development and properties of the retinotectal system has spurred
our interest in determining the function of activity-induced genes
on visual system plasticity. For instance, our studies of Homer,
Arc and CPG15 demonstrate that each has distinct roles in controlling
neuronal plasticity. Homer is a widely expressed scaffold protein,
which affects calcium signaling and metabotropic glutamate receptor
(mGluR) signaling. In addition to finding a role in axon guidance
(Foa et al., 2001; Foa et al., 2005), our more recent work indicates
that experience-dependent changes in postsynaptic Homer expression
regulates mGluR-mediated plasticity of retinotectal transmission
(Jensen, 2006). This is particularly interesting in light of recent
work suggesting that mGluR-mediated potentiation and depression
of synaptic transmission may play a role in developmental neurological
disorders such as Fragile X. CPG15, another activity-induced protein,
is noteworthy because it a GPI-linked signaling molecule whose
expression results in a large increase in dendritic arbor development,
coupled with an increase in glutamatergic retinotectal synaptic
maturation and a coordinated elaboration of presynaptic retinal
axon arbors (Nedivi et al., 1998; Cantallops et al., 2000; Nedivi
et al., 2001). We have recently shown that CPG15 mediates these
changes by promoting synapse formation, which in turn enhances
axonal arbor growth (Javaherian and Cline, 2005). These data suggest
that CPG15 is akin to an activity-induced targeted growth factor.
It now appears that many activity induced genes function in a
homeostatic manner to maintain synaptic strength within a functional
operating range, despite experience-dependent increases or decreases
in synaptic strength. This is the case for Arc (Rial Verde et
al., 2006) and Homer, as well as ornithine decarboxylase, which
generates polyamines and thereby regulates neuronal excitability
and the strength of glutamatergic synaptic transmission.
The goal of this body of work is to generate a comprehensive understanding
of the role of experience in shaping brain development. We have
taken a multidisciplinary approach to this question which has successfully
revealed the complexity of brain development. Our experiments use
a combination of molecular/genetic manipulation and quantitative
observations of structural and functional plasticity in response
to visual stimulation. Our experiments have demonstrated a diverse
range of effects of visual activity on the development and plasticity
of the visual system and have the potential to reveal both direct
and homeostatic mechanisms of circuit development. We are now poised
to move beyond analysis of individual neurons within the retinotectal
system and to address questions more related to circuit development
and function. |
| |
|
|
| Activity-induced genes, Homer1a and Arc, mediate homeostatic changes in the strength of neuronal connections. |
Kendall Van Keuren-Jensen, Emiliano Rial Verde |
A fundamental adaptive feature of neurons within a functional network
is their ability to respond to afferent activity by changing the strength
of synaptic connections. At most excitatory synapses, changes in ionotropic
AMPAR transmission underlie changes in synaptic strength while the
ligand and voltage-dependent N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs)
and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are thought to modulate
AMPAR synaptic plasticity and downstream signaling events . In two
independent sets of experiments, we find that activity-induced neuronal
genes, Homer1a and Arc, function to regulate synaptic strength in
a homeostatic manner. These data suggest that activity-induced genes
play two distinct types of functions with respect to circuit plasticity:
one function is to more-or-less directly affect synaptic strength,
for instance, as we have shown that CPG15 enhances synaptic strength
and increases dendritic and axonal arbor elaboration (Nedivi et al.,
1998; Cantallops et al., 2001; Javaherian & Cline, 2005). The
second function of activity-induced genes, is to control the magnitude
of the changes in synaptic strength through homeostatic mechanisms,
so that plasticity can occur despite stimuli which drive synaptic
strength toward extreme high or low values.Homer proteins are integral
components of the post-synaptic density and are thought to function
in synaptogenesis and plasticity, possibly through their interaction
with mGluRs. Brief metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluRs) activation
leads to plasticity of AMPA receptor synaptic transmission. To test
whether mGluR-mediated plasticity of AMPAR transmission is influenced
by recent neuronal activity, we manipulated visual activity in Xenopus
laevis tadpoles in vivo. We compared mGluR-mediated
plasticity of AMPAR transmission in optic tectal cells of tadpoles
with low levels of previous synaptic activity (overnight in the dark)
to transmission in neurons from animals following 4h of constant visual
stimulation. mGluR mediated plasticity of AMPA transmission was significantly
decreased in neurons with recent activity. By changing the ratios
of Homer 1a to Homer 1b in vivo, either by induction of endogenous
Homer1a by visual activity, or by ectopic expression of Homer1a or
Homer1b, we could change the direction of mGluR-mediated plasticity.
This is the first evidence that mGluR-mediated changes in AMPA transmission
can be regulated by Homer proteins in response to physiologically
relevant stimuli.
Figure 1. Model of Homer1a/Homer1b
regulation of mGluR-mediated changes in AMPAR synaptic transmission.
After 12-15h dark, Homer1a/Homer1b is low and mGluR
activation enhances AMPA mediated transmission. With visual stimulation
Homer1a/Homer1b increases, reducing the mGluR-mediated increase
in AMPAR synaptic transmission.
Arc is an immediate-early gene whose expression levels
are increased by strong synaptic activation, including synapse-strengthening
activity patterns. Arc mRNA is transported to activated
dendritic regions, conferring the distribution of ARC protein both
temporal correlation with the inducing stimulus and spatial specificity.
We found that increased ARC levels unexpectedly reduce the amplitude
of synaptic currents mediated by AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs).
This effect is prevented by RNAi knockdown of ARC, by deleting a
region of ARC known to interact with endophilin 3, or by blocking
clathrin-coated endocytosis of AMPARs. Our results demonstrate that
ARC reduces the number of synaptic AMPA receptors leading to a decrease
in synaptic currents, consistent with a role in the homeostatic
regulation of synaptic strength.
 |
Figure 2. Arc mediates homeostatic control of glutamatergic
transmission.
The schematic illustrates the scenario in which a region of the
dendrite receives a synapse-strengthening stimulus that causes different
amounts of potentiation in three neighbouring synapses and induces
arc mRNA expression and localization to that region. Synapse
1 is 100% potentiated, synapse 2 is not potentiated and synapse
3 is 50% potentiated. ARC-induced depression preferentially affects
synapses with relatively more GluR2/3 content. Consequently, the
potentiated-to-non-potentiated synaptic strength ratio is increased
by ARC-induced GluR2/3 removal, e.g. synapse 1-to-synapse
2 ratio: initially 1, becomes 2 after LTP and increases to 3 after
ARC has acted. In addition, total synaptic strength for that dendritic
region is homeostatically regulated (initially 6, becomes 9 after
LTP, returning to 6 after ARC’s action).
|
| |
|
Regulation of Retinal Axon Arbor Elaboration and Branch Dynamics by Synaptic Contacts. |
E. Ruthazer, J. Li |
Patterned neural activity and synaptic transmission guide the remodeling of axonal arbors in the developing central nervous system by regulating the addition, stabilization and elimination of branches as arbors grow. In the retinotectal projection of frogs and fish, the dynamic rearrangement of axonal branches actively refines and maintains the retinotopic map. Previous work in the Cline lab had demonstrated a critical role for activity-dependent Hebbian mechanisms in controlling axon branch retraction. We showed that the cellular mechanisms involved retrograde signaling downstream of activation of postsynaptic tectal NMDA receptors which effectively function as correlation detectors. These and other studies, including our studies on motor neuron axon development (Javaherian & Cline, 2005), suggest a central role for synaptic connections in axon arbor remodeling and raise the intriguing possibility that as synapses mature and strengthen, they may serve double duty as structural sites for axon branch stabilization.
To examine the role of synaptogenesis and synaptic maturation in the structural development of axonal projections during the formation of the topographic retinotectal projection, we co-expressed cytosolic fluorescent protein (FP) and FP-tagged synaptophysin (SYP) in small numbers of retinal ganglion cells in living albino Xenopus laevis tadpoles to reveal the distribution and dynamics of presynaptic sites within labeled retinotectal axons. Two-photon time lapse observations followed by quantitative analysis of tagged SYP levels at individual synapses demonstrated the time course of synaptogenesis: increases in presynaptic punctum intensity are detectible within minutes of punctum emergence and continue over many hours. Puncta lifetimes correlate with their intensities. Furthermore, we found that axon arbor dynamics are affected by synaptic contacts. Axon branches retract past faintly labeled puncta but are locally stabilized by mature synapses with intensely labeled SYP puncta. Visual stimulation for 4h enhanced the stability of the arbor at intense presynaptic puncta while concurrently inducing the retraction of exploratory branches with only faintly-labeled or no synaptic sites.
Figure 3. Branch retractions halted by mature SYP puncta
a) Schematic of axon branch retractions relative to the positions of synapses. b,c) Examples of branch retractions over 4hr that stop at mature SYP puncta (closed arrow). Faint puncta do not prevent branch retraction (open arrow). See Ruthazer et al (2006) for detailed explanation.
|
|
|
|
Depolarizing GABAergic Conductances Regulate the Balance of Excitation to Inhibition in the Developing Retinotectal Circuit in Vivo |
Neurotransmission during development regulates synaptic maturation in neural circuits, but the contribution of different neurotransmitter systems is unclear. We investigated the role of GABAA receptor-mediated Cl- conductances in the development of synaptic responses in the Xenopus visual system. Intracellular Cl- concentration
([Cl-]i) was found to be high in immature tectal neurons and then falls over a period of several weeks. GABAergic synapses are present at early stages of tectal development and, when activated by optic nerve stimulation or visual stimuli, induce sustained depolarizing Cl- conductances that facilitate retinotectal transmission by NMDA receptors. To test whether depolarizing GABAergic inputs cooperate with NMDA receptors during activity-dependent maturation of glutamatergic synapses, we prematurely reduced [Cl-]i in tectal neurons in vivo, by expressing the Cl- transporter KCC2. This blocked the normal developmental increase in AMPAR-mediated retinotectal transmission and increased GABAergic synaptic input to tectal neurons. Therefore depolarizing GABAergic transmission plays a pivotal role in the maturation of excitatory transmission and controls the balance of excitation and inhibition in the developing retinotectal circuit.
Figure 4. Early depolarizing responses to GABA are required for the development of the normal ratio of excitatory to inhibitory synaptic input in vivo. Excitatory glutamatergic input (shown in red) normally increases with development (depicted on the left as the increase in caliber of the red input in “early” compared to “late” stages of development). GABAAR activation (blue) typically depolarizes the membrane of young neurons because high [Cl-]i, depicted as the green cloud, results in Cl- efflux from the neuron when GABAAR channels open. Depolarizing GABA responses can result in activation of voltage sensitive calcium channels (purple). [Cl-]i is high in young neurons because of the relative expression levels of the Cl- transporters, NKCC1 (grey rectangle) and KCC2 (green rectangle). Increased expression of KCC2 reduces [Cl-]i so that GABAergic responses become hyperpolarizing at later stages of development. The right panel depicts the consequences of premature expression of the Cl- transporter KCC2 at early stages of neuronal development. This causes a premature reduction in [Cl-]i (smaller green cloud). Xenopus optic tectal neurons in which [Cl-]I was prematurely decreased within an otherwise normal visual system, fail to increase the strength of glutamatergic input, as seen in normal neurons, but show significantly greater GABAergic input (larger blue triangles). Bottom panel: The ratio of AMPA input to GABA input increases with development (between 4 and 16 days post-fertilization (dpf) in Xenopus optic tectal neurons),, but was significantly reduced by premature expression of KCC2, the Cl- transporter. Control cells, expressing GFP or a mutant form of the transporter,Y1087D, are comparable to untransfected cells. See Akerman & Cline, 2006 for details. |
|
|
| AMPA receptors regulate experience-dependent dendritic arbor growth in vivo |
K. Haas, J. Li |
The size and shape of neuronal dendritic arbors affect the number and type of synaptic inputs, as well as the complexity and function of brain circuits. In the intact brain, dendritic arbor growth and the development of excitatory glutamatergic synapse are concurrent. Consequently, it has been difficult to resolve whether synaptic inputs drive dendritic arbor development. Here, we test the role of AMPA receptor (AMPAR)-mediated glutamatergic transmission in dendrite growth by expressing peptides corresponding to the intracellular C-terminal domains of AMPAR subunits GluR1 (GluR1Ct) and GluR2 (GluR2Ct) in optic tectal neurons of the Xenopus retinotectal system. These peptides significantly reduce AMPAR synaptic transmission in transfected neurons while leaving visual system circuitry intact. Daily in vivo imaging over 5 days revealed that GluR1Ct or GluR2Ct expression dramatically impaired dendrite growth, resulting in less complex arbors than controls. Time-lapse images collected at 2h intervals over 6h show that both GluR1Ct and GluR2Ct decrease branch lifetimes. Ultrastructural analysis indicates that synapses formed onto neurons expressing the GluRCt are less mature than synapses onto control neurons. These data suggest that the failure to form complex arbors is due to reduced stabilization of new synapses and dendritic branches. While visual stimulation increases dendritic arbor growth rates in control tectal neurons, a weak postsynaptic response to visual experience in GluRCt-expressing cells leads to retraction of branches. These results indicate that AMPAR-mediated transmission underlies experience-dependent dendritic arbor growth by stabilizing branches, and support a competition-based model for dendrite growth.
Figure 5. Maturation of glutamatergic synapses is required for normal dendritic arbor growth and experience-dependent dendrite arbor plasticity. A) Schematic of the effect of expressing the C terminal peptides of AMPA receptors on dendritic arbor development. B) Retinal input activity to the optic tectum was increased by exposure of freely swimming tadpoles to moving-bar visual stimulation for 4h following 4h in the absence of visual stimulation. C) Relative changes in tectal neuron total dendritic arbor length and D) branch tip number over each 4h period for control neurons and neurons expressing GluR1 or GluR2 C terminal peptides. GluR1Ct and GluR2Ct neurons retracted branches in response to visual experience, while control neurons increase arbor growth with experience. (* = significant difference compared to controls within same time period, p<0.05; + = significant difference within same group between dark and visual stimulation periods, p<0.05). |
|
|
|
|
|